Lucy Review
I really enjoyed LUCY, by Laurence Gonzales. LUCY is one of those rare finds: easy to read, yet still has the power to make you think and make you question what you believe. LUCY explores the meaning of humanity, asking the question "what does it mean to be human?"
LUCY is the story of a young girl who was born and raised in the Congo by her father, a scientist studying bonobos. Bonobos have the closest genetic link to humans, with 98% of human and bonobo DNA being identical. A human and a bonobo are more closely related than a horse and a donkey, a cross which we know can produce a mule. 15 years ago, LUCY's father, an idealistic young scientist, decided that he could improve the human race and save the endangered bonobos by creating a human-bonobo hybrid using his own DNA along with that of a female bonobo. His resulting daughter appears to be completely human; but she is so much more. LUCY is a lovely, intelligent, well educated, polite, inquisitive young girl, who also has heighted senses and reflexes, increased speed and strength, and the ability to talk to the animals. But is she human? What does it really mean to be human? Will humanity accept her?
LUCY is a very thought-provoking novel on DNA, scientific morality, and even evolution. But these subjects are not the main thrust of LUCY. This book is not really about whether or not LUCY's father was right to create her, but more about "she's here, what is she?, and what do we do with her?" LUCY is such a sweet, endearing girl, you wonder how anyone could be so afraid of her.
My one criticism of LUCY is that is almost too simplistically written. The good guys are really, really good; the bad guys are really, really bad. Either people accept LUCY, or they don't. There is very little grey in this book, and, IMHO, it should be filled with grey. Additionally, the writing style of LUCY is extremely simplistic. This novel is not marketed as a YA (as far as I can tell), but that may be the more appropriate audience.
However, despite these flaws, I still found LUCY to be a very compelling story. It is something "different," and I always appreciate that in a book. Overall, LUCY is RECOMMENDED, especially if you like books that take you out of your comfort zone, and make you question what you thought you knew.
Lucy Feature
- ISBN13: 9780307272607
- Condition: New
- Notes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed
Lucy Overview
Laurence Gonzales’s electrifying adventure opens in the jungles of the Congo. Jenny Lowe, a primatologist studying chimpanzees—the bonobos—is running for her life.
A civil war has exploded and Jenny is trapped in its crosshairs . . . She runs to the camp of a fellow primatologist.
The rebels have already been there.
Everyone is dead except a young girl, the daughter of Jenny’s brutally murdered fellow scientist—and competitor.
Jenny and the child flee, Jenny grabbing the notebooks of the primatologist who’s been killed. She brings the girl to Chicago to await the discovery of her relatives. The girl is fifteen and lovely—her name is Lucy.
Realizing that the child has no living relatives, Jenny begins to care for her as her own. When she reads the notebooks written by Lucy’s father, she discovers that the adorable, lovely, magical Lucy is the result of an experiment.
She is part human, part ape—a hybrid human being . . .
Laurence Gonzales’s novel grabs you from its opening pages and you stay with it, mesmerized by the shy but fierce, wonderfully winning Lucy.
Lucy Specifications
Questions for Laurence Gonzales on Lucy
Q: The premise of Lucy is a daring one. How did you come up with the idea of a girl who is part ape?
A: I was studying petroglyphs in the high desert country of New Mexico around 1994. There is something deliciously spooky and mysterious about that country. As I was walking out there all alone, looking at those eerie pictures that someone had made maybe 1,000 years ago, I had this vision of a girl coming out of the rocks from an ancient time--this beautiful creature emerging into sunlight. It struck me that she was half human and half something else, something very ancient. I was transfixed by her. Something about her appearance made me think that she was a cross between a human and an ape. And I thought: This is really possible now. A world of possibilities opened up.
Once I had fixed on the idea, I couldn’t put it out of my mind. I was working in Hollywood at the time, writing screenplays, so my first attempt to write Lucy was actually a screenplay. But it wasn’t right. It took me the next 14 years to work it out. A few years ago I was talking with Cormac McCarthy and he asked me what I was writing next. I told him that I was writing a novel and he asked why I would want to do that, since there hadn’t been a really good novel written in decades. I nearly quit working on Lucy at that point because it was so discouraging. But in the summer of 2007, my younger daughter, Amelia, was home from college and I told her the premise of the novel. When she heard it, she insisted that I press on. She peppered me with ideas and notes of encouragement until I had completed a first draft. Then I showed it to my wife, Debbie, and my older daughter, Elena, and they both exploded with excitement about Lucy. So I was moved to really go all the way with it.
Q: Why did you decide to focus on bonobos as opposed to another type of ape?
A: Bonobos are no more plausible than chimpanzees as potential candidates for breeding with humans. In fact, my original idea was for a cross between a chimpanzee and a human. But then around 2005, I was doing research for my book Everyday Survival and was looking into the origins of humans. I heard that the largest colony of bonobos in the world was just an hour from my home in Milwaukee. So I went there to meet them. I fell in love with them. They’re sexy and clever, and they have complex language and a matriarchal social structure in which the guys do what the women tell them to do. As they got to know me better, they would come to the wire at the back of the enclosure and put their fingers through the fence, imploring me to touch them. Their hands are beautiful and so very human. There seemed no way to write Lucy without them.
Like Lucy herself, these bonobos are caught between two worlds. They can’t go back to Congo, even if we allowed it. They’re not fit for living in the wild and even if they survived, they’d be killed by bush meat hunters there or by the civil war. And yet it is so sad that they are kept in a cage. I am working to make it possible for people who read Lucy to donate money to improve their living quarters.
Q: In Lucy you tackle many serious moral and ethical issues, but at the center of it all is the question of what it means to be human. Did writing Lucy’s story help you see this question in a different light?
A: Just as science has no fixed definition of what it means to be male or female, it also has no clear way to define what it means to be human, unless we apply a strict genetic definition. And even then it gets murky. Using genetics, you could argue that someone with any genetic mutation is not human, and I don’t think we’re ready to do that. Many scientists argue, for example, that chimpanzees and bonobos should be classified as another variety of our species, Homo sapiens, or that humans should be considered another form of chimpanzee.
My face-to-face contact with bonobos, along with my research into our ancestors--the apes and early humans--made me see that we are essentially apes with all of our ape-like behaviors still intact. The first time I went to meet the bonobos in the Milwaukee Zoo, I walked up to the very thick glass behind which they lived. I looked in on a dozen or so of those individuals who were engaged in various activities--grooming and talking and climbing around. As I stood there, one of them came flying at me from somewhere high above on the end of a long rope and kicked me in the face with all his weight and momentum. If it had not been for the glass, he’d have snapped my neck and killed me. That was such a wonderfully human thing to do--to kill the stranger, as so many of us are still doing. A moment later, he was tenderly kissing another bonobo. Writing Lucy definitely shaped the way I view humans. We are still so close to our roots.
Q: Some of the most heart-wrenching scenes in the novel come from the reactions of certain groups to Lucy once the public learns about her story. Were you drawing parallels to any particular instances of intolerance that we face in society today?
A: The story I told about the bonobo who wanted to kill me illustrates the roots of our intolerance of those who are not like us. It is in our nature to protect our own group and reject other groups. The bulk of the novel was written during the administration of George W. Bush, during which violent intolerance was elevated to the level of a national ideal. Add to that the staggering ignorance, religious fanaticism, and power-mad dishonesty of that group of people, and you get a pretty good idea of what I was aiming for in the novel. I actually went into prisons and met some of the white power fanatics there. You don’t have to look very far to find the kind of people I write about in Lucy.
Q: Is there an underlying message that you hope readers will take away from reading Lucy?
A:Lucy does indeed raise many ethical, moral, and philosophical issues that are useful to think about and debate. One important issue we haven’t touched on yet is the way people think about other animals. Recent scientific study shows us that many animals are extremely intelligent and even self-aware. Some birds, for example, have consciousness that is not unlike our own. Whales and dolphins are very likely just as smart as we are. I hope that people come away from reading Lucy with a greater respect for animals of all sorts and perhaps a greater reluctance to destroy them simply because they don’t understand them. I also think it’s important to point out that I wrote most of this novel between the ages of 59 and 61. Part of what kept me going was that I had had the privilege of knowing Norman Maclean, the author of A River Runs Through It, who didn't start writing until he was in his seventies. I hope that this book serves as an inspiration to others. It’s never too late, so never give up.
But at its heart, Lucy is a coming-of-age novel about a wonderful young girl discovering herself and the world in which she finds herself. Lucy says it herself: All teenagers have feelings like hers. The message is: Lucy is a novel. It’s a story, and as such, it’s meant to make people turn the pages and laugh and cry. If they happen to have deep thoughts along the way, that’s good, too. But if all Lucy does is to make you stay up late reading, then that’s enough for me.
Related Products
Customer Reviews
Only good thing about this book was the idea... - D. Danz -
Fascinating concept- so much room to explore thought-provoking issues. But the author fell completely flat. The science was nauseatingly unbelievable, but the dialogue and human interactions even worse. Looking to explore the idea of what makes us "human?" Skip this book and read Genesis by Bernard Beckett!
A little cheesy. - Jill Guntur - New York
In the vein of science gone mad books, this one is ok. Sadly, not so farfetched that it feels impossible.
The book was ok. It was engaging enough to keep reading, but nothing truthfully to write home about. It was a little predictable.
Lucy's character fell a little flat, but the character of Jenny humanized her more and made the book palatable.
There are too many books out there that this seemed to emulate and for me, that is where the predictable factor is much, much higher. It pales in comparison to Christine Feehan's Ghostwalker series, which also look at scientific gene mutations.
Not what I hoped for - J. Hicks - Queensbury NY, United States
So are Bonobos the new Silly Band? Seems like they are everywhere.
I will mention that I read this book on the heels of the bonobo-oriented, much more interesting and entertaining nonfiction book "Sex at Dawn."
Maybe I'm just tired of pygmy chimps.
This was really an atrocious book.
The writing was hyperbolic, and frequently I found some turn of a phrase or zeugma forced and overwraught.
I couldn't get any sense of where things were going - was this a social commentary? Religious indictment? A thriller? Paean to tweens and twihards? A philosophical discussion of What is Human?
As I read this, it made me think of the movie "Splice" which was far more thought-provoking within its primary goal of being entertaining. I didn't think that Lucy was either.
Characters are either noble (Lucy et al.) or evil (fundamentalists). I'm all for hypocrisy bashing, but this is a one-note tune, and I couldn't wait for it to end.
I give the author 3 stars for tossing some interesting concepts out there for us to consider, but the predicable plot and monotonic characterizations keep me from recommending this book at all.
disappointed - Jennifer S. Switzer - EB Pensylvania
I was very disappointed in the quality of writing of this book. It's choppy, with short sentences, jumping from present to past with no clues. The point of view jumps from one character to another, which also makes it seems choppy. The overuse of flowery, over-the-top descriptions is also annoying.
*** Product Information and Prices Stored: Sep 08, 2010 18:01:06
